I have spoken up more than once in favor of balance. I do not regret this. But I believe there are different kinds of balance. There is the balance that merely meets somewhere in the middle and tries not to be too excited about anything. This is a position that seeks moderation for moderation's sake. But there is another type of balance, which is advocated by G. K. Chesterton, that consists in the holding on to both extremes and letting each have their proper place.
I am convinced that the heart of this is to be found in the gospel. In the gospel we are faced with God's love and grace and with God's holiness and justice, both in the extreme. We might want to think of some middle ground, where God was just but His justice was somewhat tempered with mercy, and we had to live up to this moderate moral standard. But He is so just that He demands perfection (Matthew 5:48; James 2:10; 1 John 1:5), but so loving that He gave His Son to offer salvation as a free gift (John 3:16-18; Romans 5:6-8; 3:21-26). He calls those who put their faith in Him to make the goal conformity to the image of His Son (2 Corinthians 3:18; Romans 8:29,30; 1 Peter 1:14-17), but to do so in the context of grace and security (Romans 8:31-39; 5:1,2; Hebrews 13:5). We are told that this is all based on God's work in us (Philippians 2:13; Colossians 1:29; 2 Peter 1:3), but we are to put out every effort to bring it about in our lives (Hebrews 12:1,2; 5:11-14; 1 Timothy 4:7,8). We are to recognize ourselves as sinners and humble ourselves before God (1 John 1:8-10; James 4:6-10; Proverbs 1:7), but are encouraged to rejoice even in difficult times because of what God has done for us (Philippians 4:4; 1 Thessalonians 5:16; John 16:33). We are to stand firmly for the truth (Jude 3; Romans 16:17,18; 2 Timothy 4:1-4), but to do so in love (2 Timothy 2:24-26; 1 Peter 3:15; Galatians 6:1).
However, it makes us nervous to grasp both extremes and have them come together to define us. It seems so much easier to find a nice safe place in the middle that is comfortable and does not demand too much from us. But to live out the truth of God I am convinced we need a wild balance rather than a tame balance. So that we might incorporate the right extremes into our lives, not by doing everything in a moderate, reserved way, but by giving every good thing its appropriate importance.
We’re Always Coming Back to the Gospel
14 hours ago
In my thinking God's love and grace are expressed in his justice and holiness. I see not need for moderation there but see the need for moderation more in how in the ways that we embrace the gray areas of life. For example, some take extreme positions on movies and beer/wine in the name of holiness while some find moderate way to experience these things. Not that all agree on this. :)
ReplyDeleteI think one of the big problems with these gray areas is we seek a one size fits all answer. I am convinced that each individual has to decide for themselves what things they need to avoid and what they can deal which in moderation. Then they need to not push their conclusions for themselves off on other people.
DeletePaul seems to say something similar in Romans 14.
DeleteUh, you have discovered my source. :)
DeleteDo you think that Jesus was a moderate person?
ReplyDeleteI think He represented the type of wild balance that Chesterton spoke of, Extreme kindness to sinful women and tax collectors and extreme severity to Pharisees and moneychangers. Not off on one extreme or the other, but not simply middle of the road either.
DeleteWell put Mike.
Delete