Correcting those in sin is a difficult thing, whether in an
individual or a church context. It is, in fact, so difficult that we tend to
avoid it. We are a live-and-let-live society. We have great reluctance to
question people or interfere with their lives. But there are also those who
take this to an opposite extreme. Who criticize people for every detail in a
harsh and condescending manner. Also, in the current divided state of the
church, it is easy just to leave if the conflict gets unpleasant, and go to the
church down the road. And if we are concerned with numbers, we may be reluctant
to drive people away. Now there is no easy solution to the present situation,
but it should not be made an excuse for not following God’s instructions as
best we can.
The first requirement here is that we need to do it (1
Corinthians 5:1,2; Galatians 6:1; 2 Thessalonians 3:14). Now we are all sinners
(1 John 1:8-10; Romans 7:14; 3:23), and there is a point where love covers a
multitude of sin (1 Peter 4:8; Proverbs 10:12; 1 Corinthians 13:5). But there
is also a point where the sin is clear and blatant and must be corrected. Now
the proper approach is to deal with the person directly (Matthew 18:15-20; Luke
17:3; Titus 3:10). This is important, because unless you confront the person directly
it is difficult for them to know where they are coming from and if you are
satisfied with their repentance. Also, we need to give them a chance to present
their case if they have one (Proverbs 18:17; 25:8-10).
Now we need to do this with gentleness (Galatians 6:1; 2
Thessalonians 3:15; Jude 22), with the goal of reconciliation and restoration
(Matthew 18:15; Galatians 6:1; Hebrews 12:13). The word restore in Galatians 6:1 is used for setting a broken bone or
mending a net; it pictures setting people back on the right path. Also, we are
told to beware of being tempted to sin ourselves (Galatians 6:1; Jude 23). But this
implies involvement in the person’s life. We are unlikely to be tempted to
participate in another person’s sin simply through confronting them and saying
they are wrong. But if we work with them, if we try to help them, if we try to
convince them to change, then it is possible they may pull us down rather than us
pulling them up. So we need to beware of this; it is a very real danger. But
there is also a danger we will evade this by not being involved at all when we
should be. There is a balance here. And the ultimate goal should be forgiveness
and restoration (2 Corinthians 2:5-11; James 5:19,20; Luke 17:4). This is not
always possible, but it needs to be the goal. For the purpose of church
discipline is not to drive people away, but to put them back on the right path.
One of the more interesting aspects is how Jesus uses the word ekklésia in a Jewish context. Seems like the better rendering of the word in this context is assembly not church. So I wonder if Jesus is telling his disciples how to resolve disputes within Jewish culture?
ReplyDeleteAlso wonder how that translates to the culture. Is the Senior Pastor in the same position of authority as the High Priest? And I wonder what sort of sins should be brought to the ekklésia? Should it replace our legals system?
I am not willing to relegate this back to a Jewish context. The passage speaks of binding and losing (Matthew 18:18)which Jesus earlier used in in connection with His new ekklésia which He was going to build (Matthew 16:18,19). Also I know of no such Jewish custom and would find it strange that Jesus was trying to create a new Jewish custom at so late a date. I would therefore see this as not so much a legal provision as a procedure for maintaining order in the community.
DeleteGreat response Mike. Some churches see bringing it to the church as meaning bringing it to church leaders to make a determination. Do you think that was what Jesus was saying?
ReplyDeleteI would say the ultimate authority in the church comes from the agreement of the believers with the attitude of seeking to follow the guidance of Christ in their midst (Matthew 18:19,20). Good leaders should help to inform this. But the congregation should be involved. It says take it to the church, not take it to the leaders.
DeleteSounds good Mike. Have you ever seen it work this way in any of the churches you have attended? I have just seen it a few times and in each case elders met with the person and announced their decision to the congregation.
DeleteFrankly I have not. But in most instances I have been involved in church discipline the person being dealt with left for another church before any final decision was made. But I will admit I have been remiss myself in standing for this principle. It is awkward, because you do not want to drag things into public when you are still dealing with the person. But the passage does seem to indicate there is a point this is necessary. I think, I need to be more careful to advocate this in the future.
DeleteI have seen pastors fired from one church and hired at another. The Matthew 18 verses do not seem to be effective in this day and age because elders are not seen as people who have authority outside of their local congregation.
DeleteOn the flipside, I have seen the Methodist church deal with pastoral infidelity in a very effective manner. It is one of the advantages of being a part of a denomination where there accountability to bishops outside of the local church. Yet even they have a limited scope and ability to handle issues.
I have seen an individual who was an extreme problem in one church go to another church of the same denomination and be made an elder. This in spite of the fact the second church was warned. And not surprisingly he became a problem in the second church too.
DeleteBut even worse is the fact that there is generally a similar church of a different denomination that is totally unconnected that will accept the person.
I do not know the solution to this, but it would help if churches would at least communicate and listen to each other.
I agree Mike. It sadly points to the state of the church. There is really no concept of anything but the local church amongst almost all evangelicals. People know this and regularly leave one church knowing that there is always another that will accept them.
ReplyDelete